Supreme Court says non-citizens dubbed ‘alien enemies’ can challenge deportations — but in Texas, not DC

May Be Interested In:Leading baby food brands making high-sugar meals, study finds


Venezuelans in the United States labeled by President Donald Trump as “alien enemies” must be given a chance to challenge their deportations before being expelled from the country, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday.

But the justices, in a 5-4 split, scrapped a trial judge’s order that had imposed a sweeping block on all deportations under Trump’s invocation of the two-centuries-old Alien Enemies Act, a war power meant to guard against foreign invasions.

The decision will shift litigation over the issue from a class-action lawsuit in Washington to federal courts in Texas, where the detainees are being held. There, the detainees can file individual petitions challenging their detentions.

Courts in Texas may not be especially receptive to such petitions. Any appeals will be heard by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, the nation’s most conservative federal appeals court.

Still, the Supreme Court’s ruling appears to deal a setback for Trump’s attempt to swiftly deport alleged members of a Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aragua, under powers used only three prior times in U.S. history, most recently in World War II.

Lawyers representing the Venezuelan nationals targeted for deportation have argued that many of them have no gang affiliation — and that the administration’s evidence of any gang ties is scant or nonexistent. The high court’s ruling makes clear that these detainees must be given some due process before they are deported.

In particular, they must be given the chance to “actually seek habeas relief in the proper venue before such removal occurs,” the high court wrote in an unsigned decision, referring to habeas corpus, the term for a challenge to unlawful imprisonment.

The detainees can also make arguments challenging Trump’s novel “interpretation” of the law to cover gang activity, the court said.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a Trump appointee, joined the court’s three liberal justices in dissenting from the court’s ruling that the detainees can only challenge their deportations through habeas corpus cases filed where they are being held. Barrett and the three liberals — Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson — would have left in place the lower-court judge’s blanket, but short-term order blocking the deportations all together.

share Share facebook pinterest whatsapp x print

Similar Content

Jake Oettinger on the Habs: “It’s crazy how this team is better than last year’s.”
Jake Oettinger on the Habs: “It’s crazy how this team is better than last year’s.” – Dose.ca
Non-hormonal male contraceptive implant lasts at least two years in trials
Non-hormonal male contraceptive implant lasts at least two years in trials
doug ford
Full text: Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s third election victory speech
Trump's first 100 days seen as bringing big changes, but still too much focus on tariffs — CBS News poll
Trump’s first 100 days seen as bringing big changes, but still too much focus on tariffs — CBS News poll
Indonesia launches free meals program to fight stunting
Indonesia launches free meals program to fight stunting
Security, competitiveness, Trump: Will 2025 be make-or-break for Europe?
Security, competitiveness, Trump: Will 2025 be make-or-break for Europe?
World in Motion: The Headlines That Matter | © 2025 | Daily News